August 25, 2016
Sixth Circuit Splits with the Second over the Wagoner Rule on Standing
Sixth Circuit revives lawsuit against lender that allegedly aided Ponzi scheme.
6th CircuitAugust 25, 2016
Judge Easterbrook Opines on the Meaning of ‘Finality’ Stemming from Bullard
Finality depends on the final resolution of a dispute, not an issue within a dispute, Circuit Judge Easterbrook says.
7th CircuitAugust 23, 2016
Finality Governed by Resolution of All Issues in an Adversary Proceeding
Unusual facts permit no exception to rigid rules on appellate jurisdiction.
10th CircuitAugust 19, 2016
Evidence Rule Gives Wide Latitude for a Homeowner’s Opinion on Value
Evidence Rule 701 requires the homeowner’s opinion on value, not someone else’s.
4th Circuit, North Carolina, North Carolina Eastern DistrictAugust 18, 2016
Diverting Assets after Confirmation Does Not Give Rise to ‘Core’ Claims
A ‘profound impact’ on an estate does not by itself result in a ‘core’ claim.
9th Circuit, California, California Northern DistrictAugust 18, 2016
Courts Divided on Contempt Sanctions as Automatically Nondischargeable
Showing intentional violation of court order isn’t enough for nondischargeability.
6th Circuit, Ohio, Ohio Southern DistrictAugust 16, 2016
Bankruptcy Court Sometimes Lacks Jurisdiction over Tax Disputes, Judge Rules
‘Related to’ jurisdiction arises only if unsecured creditors are affected, judge holds.
7th Circuit, Indiana, Indiana Southern DistrictAugust 16, 2016
Chapter 13 Remains a Haven from Paying Support Even after BAPCPA Amendment
Try garnishment, not contempt, to collect support from a chapter 13 debtor.
11th Circuit, Georgia, Georgia Southern DistrictAugust 12, 2016
Bankruptcy Court Has ‘Core’ Power to Enforce a Final ‘Non-Core’ Order, Circuit Says
Enforcing an Article III court’s decision on ownership is a ‘core’ proceeding, Judge Posner rules.
7th CircuitAugust 09, 2016
Two Circuits Tackle Rooker-Feldman in Opinions on the Same Day
Rooker-Feldman, Res Judicata and Issue Preclusion: nearly indistinguishable triplets separated at birth.
8th Circuit