The opinion by Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro reads Jevic as animating the solvent-debtor exception to the disallowance of unmatured interest.

Bankruptcy Judge Larson administratively closed a Sub V case after substantial consummation.

A chapter 11 plan may not impair the rights of a mortgage lender against a co-owner who is not in bankruptcy.

After Purdue, bankruptcy judges are now split on whether mass-tort plans are permissible if creditors must opt out.

In the first opinion on the issue after Purdue, Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez holds that Purdue did not change Fifth Circuit law where ‘hundreds’ of ‘opt-out’ plans have been confirmed with nondebtor releases.

Professors disagree on whether latent asbestos claims can be discharged without a trust for future claimants.

Local rules and local standard plans cannot force a chapter 13 debtor to disregard one of the options in Section 1327 and require revesting of estate assets on discharge.

Bankruptcy Judge Paul Bonapfel differed with two judges in Houston by holding that a nonaccepting class in Subchapter V means that a plan must be confirmed in cramdown.

Defensive setoff rights are not discharged by chapter 11 confirmation, even when no proof of claim was filed.

Claiming 100% of FMV didn’t enable debtors to exempt more than the statutory cap when there had been no objection to the exemption claim.