August 13, 2025
Liquidating Trustee Ousted for an Undisclosed Litigation Funding Agreement
The pricey litigation funding agreement had not been disclosed to creditors before confirmation.
Texas Northern DistrictAugust 11, 2025
Bestwall Concurrence Believes in ‘Liberalization’ of Bankruptcy Powers
The concurring opinion in Bestwall could be read to suggest that Circuit Judge G. Steven Agee might have an open mind if a confirmed plan comes to the Fourth Circuit on appeal.
4th CircuitAugust 08, 2025
Bestwall Dissenting Opinion Reads Like Dismissal of LTL Mgmt for a Bad Faith Filing
The Bestwall dissenter understands the Bankruptcy Clause as having the 18th century definition of ‘bankruptcy,’ thus requiring insolvency or inability to pay debts.
4th CircuitAugust 07, 2025
Fourth Circuit Rules on Jurisdiction, not ‘Financial Distress’ for a Chapter 11 Debtor
Fourth Circuit majority and dissenting opinions might be read to suggest that Bestwall could have tough sledding on an appeal from confirmation since the debtor is solvent.
4th CircuitJuly 24, 2025
Delaware’s Judge Silverstein Writes an Opinion with Stuff on Practice and Procedure
A trustee could sue on behalf of a dissolved Delaware corporation.
April 03, 2025
Third J&J Filing Dismissed on Grounds Different from the First Two Dismissals
Houston’s Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez decided that the newest plan by a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary didn’t qualify for nondebtor releases permissible in asbestos cases.
5th Circuit, Texas, Texas Southern DistrictJanuary 24, 2025
Companies Can Be ‘Bankruptcy Remote,’ if Properly Done
Bankruptcy Judge David Cleary wrote a manual on how a company can be ‘bankruptcy remote’ without violating public policy.
7th Circuit, Illinois, Illinois Northern DistrictNovember 01, 2024
Substantive Consolidation May Proceed by Motion, District Judge Says
A district court in Florida upheld Bankruptcy Judge Peter Russin in holding that substantive consolidation does not require an adversary proceeding, a summons or a complaint.
11th Circuit, Florida, Florida Southern DistrictOctober 10, 2024
The ‘Insured vs. Insured’ Exclusion in a D&O Policy Doesn’t Apply to a DIP
When a DIP sues a former officer, the bankruptcy ‘exception’ in a D&O policy provides coverage when the ‘insured vs. insured’ exclusion would otherwise deny coverage.
5th Circuit, Texas, Texas Southern DistrictSeptember 26, 2024
A Former Officer Was Not ‘Disinterested’ but Could Be Retained as a Professional Person
Judge Dale Somers adopted a ‘liberal’ construction of Section 1107(b) to retain a professional person who had been an officer of the debtor.
10th Circuit, Kansas