June 27, 2025
Debtor Granted Absolution for a 10-Day Delay in Serving a $40 Million Preference Suit
Although there wasn’t ‘good cause’ to excuse late service of a summons and complaint, the bankruptcy court salvaged a large preference by exercising discretion and granting a 10-day expansion of the 90-day deadline.
2nd Circuit, New York, New York Southern DistrictJune 24, 2025
BAP Upholds Confirmation of a Plan with No Trust for Future Asbestos Claimants
Ninth Circuit BAP confirmed a plan with no future creditors’ trust when the debtor claimed there were no future claims and no one was in court representing future claimants.
9th CircuitJune 20, 2025
WARN Act Damages of $15,100 Per Worker Are Section 507(a)(4) Priority Claims
A chapter 11 debtor may be saddled with smaller WARN Act claims by imposing mass layoffs after filing.
5th Circuit, MississippiJune 16, 2025
Plan Didn’t Extinguish Debts, Only Discharged Them, Fifth Circuit Says
A plan saying that it satisfies and settles claims does nothing more than discharge the claims. It doesn’t extinguish the claims, the Fifth Circuit says.
5th CircuitJune 06, 2025
Fifth Circuit Explains When There Is No Double Recovery from Avoiding a Lien
Circuit Judge Edith Jones explains that the word ‘or’ in Section 550(a) doesn’t mean ‘and.’
5th CircuitMay 27, 2025
Consent Is an Exception to Jevic’s Insistence on Respecting Priorities in Distribution
Consent from administrative creditors provided grounds for approving DIP financing and a sale when the estate was administratively insolvent.
11th Circuit, Florida, Florida Southern DistrictMay 22, 2025
Two Courts Hold: Injunctions Are Ok to Protect Nondebtors for the Life of a Plan
Judge Meredith Grabill of New Orleans agreed with New York’s Judge Mastando that a Subchapter V plan can enjoin lawsuits against nondebtors for the life of a three-year plan.
5th Circuit, Louisiana, Louisiana Eastern DistrictMay 21, 2025
Segal v. Rochelle May Remain Good Law Only in Limited Circumstances
The elaborate definition of ‘estate property’ in Section 541(a) may have superseded the 1966 ‘sufficiently rooted’ analysis in Segal.
11th Circuit, Georgia, Georgia Southern DistrictMay 09, 2025
In ‘13,’ a Creditor Wanted Debtors’ Counsels’ Fees to Come Last, Not First
Chicago’s Bankruptcy Judge Donald Cassling nixed an idea that would have made chapter 13 unpalatable for debtors’ counsel.
7th Circuit, Illinois, Illinois Northern DistrictMay 05, 2025
‘Notice’ in Rule 3002(c)(7) Means Notice of the Bar Date, Not Notice of the Case
Bankruptcy Judge Scott Grossman adopted the analysis by Bankruptcy Judge Brian Walsh in concluding that creditors are entitled to notice of the claims bar date, not just notice of the filing.
11th Circuit, Florida, Florida Southern District