Skip to main content
ABI Journal

November 27, 2017

Trustee’s Stated Intent to Abandon by Itself Won’t Allow a Debtor to Sell

Estate property must be formally abandoned before the power of sale reverts to the debtor.

2nd Circuit, New York, New York Southern District

November 15, 2017

New GM Ignition Switch Suits Can Proceed in State Court, District Judge Says

The circuit court’s resolution of the bankruptcy law question prevents New GM from removing new suits to federal court.

2nd Circuit, New York, New York Southern District

November 13, 2017

PACA Trust Claims Don’t Defeat the Power to Use Cash Collateral

PACA trust creditors can’t hold a chapter 11 debtor hostage, judge rules.

6th Circuit, Michigan, Michigan Western District

November 07, 2017

Supreme Court Primed to Hold Safe Harbor Inapplicable if Bank Is a ‘Mere Conduit’

Justices search for a ruling that limits Section 546(e) but isn’t too broad.

Supreme Court

October 26, 2017

Third Circuit Explains When Sale Orders Are Not Automatically Moot

Section 363(m) allows an appeal if the remedy won’t upset the sale itself, Third Circuit says.

3rd Circuit

October 20, 2017

First Circuit Narrowly Defines Fiduciaries Who Are Prohibited Buyers of Estate Assets

First Circuit narrowly applies equitable mootness in a receivership sale.

1st Circuit

October 11, 2017

Inaccurate Disclosure Nixes a $275 Million Energy Future Breakup Fee Approved a Year Earlier

Breakup fee cannot be paid if the court or regulators disapprove a proposed sale.

3rd Circuit, Delaware

September 29, 2017

No New Bankruptcy Cases Have Been Added to Supreme Court Docket — Not Yet, at Least

Several cases are in the running for Supreme Court review this term or next.

Supreme Court

September 22, 2017

Ninth Circuit Sits En Banc to Eradicate or Deepen a Loophole in PACA

Circuit split pits the Ninth Circuit against three sister circuits on a crucial PACA issue.

9th Circuit

September 14, 2017

Third-Party Releases Approved Without Awaiting the Outcome of Merit Management

Third-party releases would have been approved even if there were no ‘safe harbor’ defense.

3rd Circuit, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Western District