November 21, 2017
“Substantial Contribution” Claim Allowed in Chapter 13
Split grows on whether ‘substantial contribution’ claims are limited to chapters 9 and 11.
6th Circuit, Michigan, Michigan Eastern DistrictOctober 16, 2017
ASARCO Read to Bar Fee-Defense Costs Even with a Fee-Shifting Agreement
Court shows antipathy to all theories seeking allowance of fees incurred in collecting fees.
5th Circuit, Texas, Texas Western DistrictOctober 06, 2017
Circuits Split, Judge Teel Earmarks Collateral Surcharges for All ‘Admin’ Creditors
Law v. Siegel didn’t insulate professionals from disgorging interim fee awards.
D.C. Circuit, District of ColumbiaOctober 05, 2017
No Statutory Fees for Standing Chapter 13 Trustees if Dismissal Precedes Confirmation
With no circuit authority, lower courts are split on the fate of standing trustees’ fees when a chapter 13 case is dismissed before confirmation.
October 04, 2017
Counsel Must Eat Filing Fees in ‘No-Money-Down’ Chapter 13s
Lawyers can’t be reimbursed for advancing filing fees through fee applications or ‘no-look’ fees.
5th Circuit, Louisiana, Louisiana Western DistrictSeptember 25, 2017
Retention Agreements Allowing Defense Fees Ok in New Mexico, but Not in Delaware
Baker Botts v. ASARCO doesn’t prohibit retention agreements allowing fees for defense of fees, judge holds.
10th Circuit, New MexicoSeptember 21, 2017
Survivor’s Pension Benefits Are Not ‘Retiree Benefits’ Protected by Section 1114
Judge uses legislative history because Section 1114 is ambiguous.
2nd Circuit, New York, New York Southern DistrictSeptember 18, 2017
Delaware Judge Narrows Jevic to Prohibit Only End-of-Case Priority Skipping
Priority skipping permitted as part of final approval of DIP financing.
3rd Circuit, DelawareAugust 30, 2017
Third Party Liability for Debtor’s Counsel Fees Precludes a Charging Lien
Third party liability for attorneys’ fees can leave debtor’s counsel in a worse position following nonpayment.
2nd Circuit, New York, New York Southern DistrictAugust 09, 2017
‘Gift Plan’ Succeeds in Delaware Despite Jevic’s Ban on ‘Structured Dismissals’
Case shows why gift plans and structured dismissals demand a different analysis.
3rd Circuit, Delaware